Decreto-legge 103 of 13 July 2021 did not stop cruise ships coming to the Venetian lagoon. It banned four classes of ship from three named waterways in the historic city, and in the same breath appointed a Commissario Straordinario to build temporary berths for those same ships at Porto Marghera. In 2025 the port handled 584,284 cruise passengers, 6.7% more than the year before. Nobody publishes how many of them stepped ashore in Marghera.
Silence Index — D-214
Busy
Ranks 97 of 99 scored dossiers — quieter than 2% of the others we have scored. A low score is not a warning; it describes who else will be standing next to you.
How the total is weighted. These are the fixed weights of the four inputs, the same on every dossier — not this place’s scores. We do not publish per-input bars, because the per-input values were never recorded article by article and inventing four plausible numbers that sum to the total would be a fabrication dressed as a chart.
This dossier was scored before 2 September 2026, when the fourth input became night darkness. It keeps the input it was reasoned with until it is re-scored at its next source re-check; the methodology page records the change.
The index is a desk instrument scored by this publication, not a field measurement. How it is calculated, and where it fails.
What this dossier is built from
Nobody from this publication has been to Porto Marghera. What follows is desk research, assembled from the Italian culture ministry's own release on the decree; the annual report, quarterly traffic bulletins and season notes of the Autorità di Sistema Portuale del Mare Adriatico Settentrionale; the dedicated site of the Commissario Straordinario the decree created; that authority's energy and environmental planning document; three World Heritage Committee decisions and three of Italy's own state-of-conservation reports to UNESCO; the Comune di Venezia's statistical service; ARPAV and ISPRA on contaminated land; the official access-fee site; and the GeoNames gazetteer.
It is not an article about Venice. Venice sits five kilometres east across the water and has been written about sufficiently. This is about the address the ships were moved to, and about the fact that almost nothing published about the ban is written from here.
The decree, read from the receiving end
The Ministero della Cultura's release sets out what the decree of 13 July 2021 does. From 1 August 2021 it prohibits the transit of ships meeting any one of four thresholds: gross tonnage above 25,000; hull longer than 180 metres; air draught above 35 metres; or manoeuvring on fuel with a sulphur content of 0.1% or more. That prohibition applies through three named waterways and no others — the Bacino di San Marco, the Canale di San Marco and the Canale della Giudecca. The lagoon is not named. The port is not named. Marghera is named, but in the other half of the sentence.
Because the same release records that the decree appoints the president of the port system authority as Commissario Straordinario, charged with delivering "almeno quattro punti di attracco temporanei nell'area di Marghera" — at least four temporary mooring points in the Marghera area — for precisely the ships above 25,000 gross tonnes that had just been excluded from the canals. It also establishes compensation for the shipping companies and for workers in the affected shipping and logistics trades.
The instrument is therefore not a prohibition on an activity. It is a relocation order with a prohibition attached, and it was drafted as one. Read in Rome it is a protection measure. Read in Marghera it is a works programme, and the works programme is the part that came with a budget.
One detail we cannot settle. The culture ministry says "at least four" mooring points. Italy's own 2024 report to the World Heritage Committee says "no more than 5", and the commissioner's own site says "up to five". A floor and a ceiling are not the same instruction, and we print all three rather than choose.
What popular coverage gets wrong
The sentence that travelled the world in July and August 2021 was "Venice bans cruise ships". It is still in guidebooks, in sustainability round-ups, in airline magazines and in the standing stock of things everybody knows. It is wrong in three separate ways, and the primary record corrects each of them without any interpretation on our part.
It is wrong about the geography. The ban is a list of three canals, not a city and not a lagoon. Ships above the thresholds may still enter the lagoon through the Malamocco inlet and run the industrial channel to Marghera and Fusina; that is what the decree provides for. The port authority's own note on the 2024 season lists the quays in use — the Liguria and Lombardia quays at Marghera, two quays at Fusina, and San Basilio — and notes that the Marittima terminal in Venice itself is "restricted to vessels under 25,000 tonnes per Italy's Legislative Decree 103/21". The Marittima was not closed. It was capped.
It is wrong about the tense. Nothing stopped. In 2022, the first full season under the decree, the system handled roughly 240,000 passengers across more than 200 calls. The port authority's 2024 annual report records 547,587 cruise passengers at Venice, up 7.7% on 2023. Its January 2026 bulletin records 584,284 for 2025, up 6.7%, with the two ports together at 617,454. Its April 2026 traffic note, covering the twelve months to March 2026, gives more than 621,000 and a Venice increase of 8.3%. The calendar-year and rolling-year figures are different measures of a curve that points the same way, and we give both rather than blending them.
And it is wrong about the destination. In November 2022 the commissioner, Fulvio Lino Di Blasio, stated the objective plainly: capacity for one million cruise passengers at Venice and Chioggia by 2027, ninety per cent of them homeporting. Italy's 2024 report to UNESCO puts numbers on where that million is meant to sleep: 700,000 at Porto Marghera's North Canal terminal, 250,000 at Venice's own cruise terminal, 50,000 at Chioggia. Against a pre-decree figure the same report gives as about two million a year, that is genuinely a reduction. It is also, on the state's own arithmetic, a plan in which seven passengers in ten arrive in Marghera.
What the coverage got right is narrow and real: the hulls no longer pass the Giudecca. That is the whole of it, and it is not nothing. It is simply not what the headline said.
The number that does not exist
We set out to answer one question — how many of the 547,587 came ashore at Marghera — and we cannot answer it, because the figure does not appear to be published anywhere.
The port authority reports cruise passengers at two levels of geography: Venezia and Chioggia. The 2024 annual report gives 547,587 and 49,754 respectively and stops. The fourth-quarter 2025 statistical bulletin sets 547,587 beside 584,284 with a difference of 36,697 and a rate of 6.7%, and stops. There is no line for the Liguria quay, none for Lombardia, none for Fusina, none for San Basilio, and none for the Marittima. The season note that gives 242 calls, 39 ships, 20 lines and 95% homeporting for 2024 lists the quays but attaches no passengers to any of them.
We are not going to estimate it. It would be easy to take the 25,000-tonne cap at the Marittima, the premium-and-luxury share, the homeport percentage and the berth count and produce a confident number, and it would be arithmetic dressed as evidence. The honest statement is this: the split between the historic city and its mainland district is not in the public record, and the absence is itself the finding. A relocation policy has been running for five seasons without publishing how much has been relocated.
What Marghera actually received
The commissioner's programme is documented, and it is substantial. Two temporary moorings were upgraded and handed to the 2022 season — the Liguria quay at the Vecon terminal and the Lombardia quay at the TIV terminal, both of them working container and general-cargo berths asked to take passenger ships as well. A further berth was made available at Chioggia. Fusina contributes two of four berths, separating cruise flows from the ro-ro traffic already using it, and the terminal building there was costed by the terminal operator at €4.9 million within a €6.3 million programme, sized at 3,000 square metres and 400 passengers an hour.
Then the permanent works. In July 2024 the commissioner and APV Investments signed for about ten hectares on the north bank of the Canale Nord, on macro-island 1 of the Porto Marghera industrial zone, bought from Società Intermodale Marghera s.r.l. for €16 million. The purchase completed in July 2025. The terminal designed for it runs to roughly 10,000 square metres over two levels, serves two ships up to 300 metres, and carries an estimated build cost above €67 million, with about 40,000 square metres of car park beside it and the 2028 season as the target. Shore power for the terminal and two docks was contracted to NBI S.p.A. at €18.5 million, inside a €29 million allocation from Next Generation EU through the national recovery plan.
Across the whole commissioner's mandate the annual appropriations run €2 million in 2021, €9 million in 2022, €15 million in 2023, €42 million in 2024, €55 million in 2025 and €35 million in 2026: €158 million of public money, spent almost entirely on the mainland, to make possible a prohibition celebrated in the historic centre.
The rest of the file is the unglamorous part. Environmental impact assessments for the Canale Nord terminal, for dredging the Canale Vittorio Emanuele and for dredging the Canale Malamocco–Marghera were all admitted by the environment ministry in July 2025, with public comment closing on 6 August 2025. Dredging is how a channel built for tankers and container ships is made to take cruise hulls, and in this lagoon dredging means lifting sediment inside a contaminated site.
The ground under the berths
Porto Marghera is not neutral ground. ARPAV, the Veneto environmental agency, records that remediation procedures in the region sit with municipalities, that areas within the lagoon drainage basin sit with the Region under regional law 19/2013, and that the SIN of Venezia–Porto Marghera sits with the national ministry. A Sito di Interesse Nazionale is the most serious contamination classification Italian law has. ISPRA counts 42 of them nationally, covering a little over 148,000 hectares of land — 0.49% of the country — plus roughly 76,000 hectares of sea inside some perimeters. We could not open the ministry's site file for the Marghera perimeter and we therefore do not state its area; we state only that it exists and what it means.
This is the district being asked to host the traffic. It is also a district in the middle of its own second life. In April 2026 the port authority announced a plastic-recycling plant by Eco+Eco s.r.l. of the VERITAS group on more than 41,000 square metres of the former Alcoa site on Via della Geologia: €34 million of investment, €22 million of it plant, and about a hundred jobs. That is what industrial succession looks like at close range — a smelter's footprint, a recycler's lease, a hundred posts where there were once thousands.
The environmental accounting the port does publish is worth reading against the ban. Its energy and environmental planning document, on a 2017 baseline, puts the port cluster's carbon dioxide at about 170,482 tonnes, of which cruise vessels account for 18,147 tonnes at berth and 6,878 manoeuvring — around fifteen per cent of the total, against 87,001 tonnes from commercial ships at berth. Shore power is the intended answer, and it is being installed at Marghera first. Since May 2021 the authority has also run a permanent noise network with fixed Class I sound-level meters at Venice, Marghera, Fusina and Chioggia, with the University of Padua under a framework agreement of 9 April 2020, and a fixed air quality station at Fusina whose data go to ARPAV.
The fee that stops at the bridge
The second instrument everyone misreports is the contributo di accesso, and its geography tells the same story as the decree's. It is charged for entry to the Città antica between 08:30 and 16:00 on listed days: €5 if paid by the fourth-last day before arrival, €10 inside three days or at a tobacconist. The 2026 list ran in blocks from early April to 26 July, after which the trial ended. Italy told UNESCO the scheme covered 25 April to 14 July in 2024, 54 days in 2025 and 60 days in 2026.
Residents of the Comune di Venezia are exempt, and so are people born in Venice, residents of the Veneto generally, and under-fourteens. Marghera is inside the Comune, so Marghera pays nothing — but Marghera is also outside the charged perimeter, and the charged perimeter is the thing the money is spent maintaining. The instrument raises revenue from visitors to the historic centre for the upkeep of the historic centre. It does not touch a passenger who lands at a mainland quay, boards a coach and never enters the old city, and it sends nothing to the district where the coach was parked.
Why the Silence Index is 34
Physical remoteness scores close to nothing: Marghera has a motorway, a railway station of its own and a bus service, and it is a quarter of an hour from Venezia Santa Lucia. Access friction is genuinely split — the residential quartieri are an ordinary Italian suburb of some 28,622 people by the gazetteer's count, while the quays that this article is about are inside a working port perimeter with no public access and no viewing point. Visitor volume, for the district as a destination rather than as a doorway, is close to zero; several hundred thousand people a year pass through Porto Marghera without any of them being there. The fourth input we weight is unresolved questions, and here it is high: the central number in this dossier is one nobody publishes. A place that is easy to reach, impossible to enter, unvisited on purpose and unmeasured in public sits in the middle thirties, not the eighties.
What Marghera is owed
Italy's 2026 report to UNESCO describes the new arrangement as a model that excludes large ships from the lagoon, spreads medium and small ships across docks at Marghera and Chioggia, halves passenger numbers and applies cold ironing. Every clause of that is defensible and the last one is being paid for. But the halving is measured against 2019, and the trend since 2022 has been upward every year toward a stated target of a million.
The World Heritage Committee has been consistent about what it actually wants. In 2021 it welcomed the ban. In 2023 it reconfirmed it and asked Italy to "continue to prioritise the option of redirecting large ships to other more suitable ports". In 2025 it warned that without coordinated action the property could come to meet the criteria for the List of World Heritage in Danger. A competition for berths outside the lagoon has been running since 2021 under a separate decree, with deadlines that have moved from June 2023 to a November 2024 submission and a preliminary design due in March 2026; Italy's 2026 report says new docks outside the lagoon will be built only after a new port master plan is approved. Until that happens, Marghera is the answer, and "temporary" is doing a great deal of work.
None of this is an argument that the ships should go back down the Giudecca. The 2019 collision between the MSC Opera and a river barge in that canal, which the World Heritage Centre's own 2021 documentation records, settled that question on its merits. It is an argument about accounting. A city five kilometres east received a headline, a photograph and a reputation for having acted. A petrochemical district on contaminated ground received the hulls, the dredging, the coaches, the €158 million works programme and the shore-power bill — and did not receive a line in the statistics saying how many people it handled. When the neighbour is the one who takes delivery, the least the record can do is count what was delivered.
Corner Codex — D-214
- Place
- Porto Marghera, Municipalità di Marghera, Comune di Venezia, Veneto
- Coordinates
- Marghera, 45.4511°N 12.2239°E (GeoNames populated place)
- Distance from the banned canals
- About 5 km west-north-west of the Bacino di San Marco
- The instrument
- Decreto-legge 103 of 13 July 2021, converted by Law 125/2021
- What was banned
- Transit of four classes of ship through three named waterways, from 1 Aug 2021
- What was ordered built
- Temporary mooring points at Marghera, for exactly those ships
- Cruise passengers, port of Venice
- 547,587 in 2024 (+7.7%); 584,284 in 2025 (+6.7%)
- Passengers before the decree
- About 2 million a year, on Italy's own account to UNESCO
- Terminal-level split
- Not published. The port reports Venezia and Chioggia, and no further
- Public money committed
- €158m to the Commissario Straordinario, 2021–2026
- The new terminal
- 10 ha bought for €16m; build costed above €67m; 2028 season
- Contaminated ground
- Venezia–Porto Marghera is a Sito di Interesse Nazionale
- Silence Index
- 34 / 100
The Traveler's Panel · checked
Changing information. Prices, permits, seasons and road access change, sometimes at short notice. Everything here is a starting point for your own confirmation — not a quote, and not a guarantee. Verify with the operator and the relevant official body before you book.
| What was banned | Transit of four ship classes through three named canals, from 1 Aug 2021 |
| What was not banned | The lagoon, the port, or cruise calls. Marittima was capped at 25,000 t |
| Where the ships go | Liguria and Lombardia quays at Marghera, two quays at Fusina, San Basilio |
| Traffic since | 584,284 cruise passengers at Venice in 2025, up 6.7% on 2024 |
| Stated target | One million passengers at Venice and Chioggia by 2027, 90% homeporting |
| Public spend | €158m to the Commissario Straordinario across 2021–2026 |
| Ground conditions | The whole district is a Sito di Interesse Nazionale |
| Can you see the quays | No. They sit inside a working port with no public access point |
Getting there — Venezia Mestre or Venezia Porto Marghera station → Marghera by bus or on foot; the cruise quays themselves are inside the port perimeter
- Marghera is not remote and does not pretend to be. It has its own railway station on the Venezia–Padova line, it is minutes by bus from Mestre, and the Ponte della Libertà puts Venezia Santa Lucia about a quarter of an hour away. Anyone who has arrived in Venice by train or car has already been through it, generally without registering the fact.
- The residential quartieri are open to anyone, because they are an ordinary Italian suburb of some 28,622 people by the gazetteer's count, laid out around a garden-city plan and a century of industrial employment. There is nothing to arrange and nothing to book.
- The port is a different proposition. Porto Marghera is a working industrial and commercial port, and the Liguria and Lombardia quays where the cruise ships berth sit inside terminals operated by PSA Vecon and TIV. Access is by port pass through the authority's own procedures, for people with business there. There is no visitor route, no viewing platform and no published vantage point, and we found none.
- If you are a cruise passenger rather than a visitor, the direction of travel is the reverse: you will be inside the perimeter and outside the district. Coach transfers move homeport passengers between the quays and Venice, and the great majority of calls here are homeport calls — 95% in the 2024 season, on the port authority's own figures.
- Fusina, the second cluster of berths, is a separate place again: a ferry and ro-ro terminal on the mainland edge of the lagoon in the comune of Mira, about 45°25'11"N 12°15'25"E, with its own approach road and its own long history as the crossing point to Venice.
Indicative costs — verify before booking
| Visiting Marghera | Nothing. It is a suburb of a large city with public transport and no gate |
| Seeing the cruise quays | Not priceable. They are inside a port perimeter and there is no visitor access we could verify |
| The access fee | Does not apply here. It is charged for the Città antica only, and residents of the Comune di Venezia — Marghera included — are exempt in any case |
| What the public paid | €158m to the commissioner 2021–2026, €16m for the terminal land, above €67m estimated for the terminal, €18.5m contracted for shore power |
| What we will not quote | Cruise fares, transfer prices or tour costs. Every figure we found came from a company selling the product, and none from a public tariff |
What to pack
- Nothing special. This is a working district with shops, buses and a railway station, and it is in the same municipality as one of the most visited cities in Europe.
- A long lens is the wrong instinct here. The quays are not photographable from public ground and attempting it around a port perimeter is a poor idea in any country.
- Reading matter, if you want the argument rather than the view: the culture ministry's release on the decree, and Italy's own state-of-conservation reports to UNESCO, which are franker about where the passengers are going than most coverage is.
- Ordinary caution about ground and dust in a district under long-running remediation. Stay on public roads and out of fenced land, which is a legal boundary here and not a suggestion.
- Low expectations about signage. Nothing in Marghera announces that this is where the ships the world thinks were banned actually tie up.
Where to stay
There is accommodation in Marghera and it exists mostly because of Venice: a strip of chain hotels near the motorway and the causeway, priced and marketed as budget alternatives to the historic centre, which is precisely the relationship this dossier is about. Staying here is cheaper, quieter and about fifteen minutes by rail from Santa Lucia, and it also means the tourist night tax and the day-visitor fee land differently: the access fee applies to the Città antica between 08:30 and 16:00 on listed days, not to the mainland, and in 2026 it ended altogether on 26 July. Mestre, immediately north, has far more rooms and the same connection. We would not send anyone here for the scenery, and we would send them here for the argument: a night in Marghera and a morning walk to the edge of the port zone tells you more about how the 2021 decree actually works than a week in San Marco does.
Safety & responsible travel
- Do not repeat 'Venice banned cruise ships' as a completed act. The decree names three canals and orders berths built five kilometres away, and the port's own passenger numbers have risen every year since.
- If you are writing about the ban, name the receiving district. A story that ends at the Giudecca is a story that stops one page before the point.
- Treat the port perimeter as a workplace, because it is one. The quays that take cruise ships are container and general-cargo berths in ordinary commercial use.
- Be careful with the emissions claim in both directions. Shore power at Marghera is real, contracted and partly EU-funded; the port's own 2017 inventory also puts cruise vessels at roughly a seventh of the cluster's carbon dioxide, well behind commercial shipping at berth.
- Spend in Marghera if you are there, rather than treating it as the car park for somewhere else. That is the whole argument of this dossier in one practical form.
Nearby, and quieter
Fusina, on the lagoon edge about eight kilometres south, is the other half of the redistributed cruise model and also the place where the Brenta canal meets the water — the old crossing to Venice, now a ro-ro and cruise terminal contributing two of four berths. Just inland stands the Villa Foscari, the Palladian house long known as La Malcontenta, which has spent five hundred years watching whatever the mainland was doing that century. North of the industrial zone is Forte Marghera, at 45°28'29"N 12°15'45"E, the nineteenth-century fort that gave the district its name before there was a port. Chioggia, at the lagoon's southern end, is the third node of the new model and took 33,170 cruise passengers in 2025 against 49,754 the year before. And Venice is fifteen minutes away by train, where you can stand on the Zattere and watch a canal that no longer has ships in it.
Getting there, in order
- 1Venezia Mestre or Venezia Porto Marghera station
- 2Marghera by bus or on foot; the cruise quays themselves are inside the port perimeter
Each leg is a separate booking and a separate chance to be weathered out. Build spare days into the chain, not onto the end of it.
Where it is
Porto Marghera and the Municipalità di Marghera, Comune di Venezia · 45.4511°N 12.2239°E · Open in Google Maps · OpenStreetMap
Key locations
- Marghera — the populated place, 28,622 residents in the GeoNames gazetteer
45.4511°N 12.2239°E - Venezia Porto Marghera station — the district's own railway station on the mainland line
45.4722°N 12.2553°E - Forte Marghera — the nineteenth-century fort the district and the port are named after
45.4747°N 12.2625°E - Fusina — second cruise berth cluster, two of four berths, operational from 2022
45.4197°N 12.2569°E - Canale della Giudecca — one of the three waterways closed to large ships from 1 August 2021
45.4272°N 12.3289°E - Bacino di San Marco — gazetteer records it as an anchorage; named in the ban
45.4328°N 12.3406°E - Chioggia — third node of the redistributed model, 33,170 cruise passengers in 2025
45.2078°N 12.2928°E - Porto di Chioggia — the port facility that took a temporary mooring in 2022
45.2231°N 12.2769°E
Coordinates are for orientation and are accurate to roughly the width of the feature named, not to a doorway. Several of these points are inside protected areas or need a permit, a guide or a boat — read the access notes above before you plan a route to any of them.
Sources & further reading — checked
- Ministero della Cultura — comunicato 'Grandi Navi' (13 July 2021). The decree of 13 July 2021: the ban from 1 August on ships over 25,000 tonnes, hulls over 180 m, air draught over 35 m or fuel of 0.1% sulphur or more, through the Bacino di San Marco, Canale di San Marco and Canale della Giudecca; the port authority president as Commissario Straordinario for 'almeno quattro punti di attracco temporanei nell'area di Marghera'; and compensation for shipping companies and workers
- AdSP Mare Adriatico Settentrionale — Relazione Annuale 2024. 547,587 cruise passengers at Venice in 2024, up 7.7%, and 49,754 at Chioggia; total Venice throughput 24,104,354 tonnes, up 3.5%; containers down 2.5% in TEU; 97 authority staff at 31 December 2024; and the PNRR complementary-fund project 'Elettrificazione Banchine Aree di Marghera'. Cruise figures are given for Venezia and Chioggia only, with no terminal breakdown
- Port of Venice — 'Cruises in Venice: growth expected in 2024' (season note). 242 calls, 39 ships, 20 lines, 95% homeporting and 90% premium and luxury for 2024, forecast at 540,000 passengers against 497,000 in 2023; the quays in use at Marghera (Liguria, Lombardia), Fusina (two quays, a new 3,000 m² terminal at €4.9m within €6.3m) and San Basilio; and the Marittima restricted to vessels under 25,000 tonnes per Legislative Decree 103/21
- Port of Venice — 'Statistical data on traffic for the year 2025' (19 January 2026). Venice at 25,289,943 tonnes in 2025, up 4.9%, and Chioggia at 901,065; 532,762 TEU, up 11.2%; and cruise passengers of 617,454 across the system, with Venice at 584,284, up 6.7%, and Chioggia declining to 33,170
- AdSP Mare Adriatico Settentrionale — Port of Venice traffic bulletin, fourth quarter 2025 (PDF). The underlying table setting 547,587 and 584,284 cruise passengers side by side with a difference of 36,697 and a rate of 6.7%, and Chioggia at 49,754 and 33,170; and the confirmation that the bulletin reports cruise passengers at port level only, with no berth or terminal split
- Port of Venice — 'Growing traffic for the Veneto Port System' (28 April 2026). The twelve months to March 2026: Venice above 25 million tonnes, up 4.4%, the system above 26 million, about 540,000 TEU up 9.8%, and more than 621,000 cruise passengers with Venice up 8.3% and Chioggia at 33,261 — a rolling-year measure that runs alongside the calendar-year series
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere a Venezia — home. Fulvio Lino Di Blasio as Commissario Straordinario under decree 103/2021 converted by Law 125/2021; the Liguria and Lombardia quays completed in 2022 and a Chioggia mooring the same year; up to five temporary moorings planned in the Marghera area; €158 million of intervention; and 2027 as the completion target
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — 'The project'. The four workstreams — temporary moorings, dredging of the Vittorio Emanuele and Malamocco–Marghera canals, accessory works and research — and the year-by-year appropriations: €2m in 2021, €9m in 2022, €15m in 2023, €42m in 2024, €55m in 2025 and €35m in 2026
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — 'Temporary moorings in Marghera'. The Liguria quay at the PSA Vecon terminal and the Lombardia quay at the TIV terminal upgraded and made available for the 2022 cruise season; up to five moorings envisaged in Porto Marghera by 2026; and a feasibility study for a new maritime station on the north side of the Canale Nord
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — 'Fusina terminal'. Fusina operational from the 2022 cruise season, contributing two of the four berths available, designed to separate cruise passenger, provisioning and baggage flows from the ro-ro traffic of cars and articulated vehicles already using the site, within the limits of decree 103/2021
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — 'Purchase of area for the new passenger terminal at the North Canal completed and work begun on wharf electrification' (7 July 2025). About ten hectares on macro-island 1 of Porto Marghera bought from Società Intermodale Marghera s.r.l. for €16 million; a terminal of roughly 10,000 m² over two levels serving two ships up to 300 m, costed above €67 million for the 2028 season; a 40,000 m² car park; and cold ironing contracted to NBI S.p.A. at €18.5 million within a €29 million Next Generation EU allocation
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — 'A new cruise model is born in Venice' (30 Nov 2022). Commissioner Di Blasio's stated objective of capacity for one million cruise passengers at Venice and Chioggia by 2027, ninety per cent of them homeporting; the 2022 baseline of about 240,000 passengers across more than 200 calls; and the planned Porto Marghera passenger terminal on the north bank of the Canale Nord with two associated berths
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — 'North Canal – North Bank Terminal' (11 July 2025). The environment ministry's notification of 7 July 2025 that the environmental impact assessment for two wharves, their aprons and a passenger terminal at the Canale Nord north bank was admissible, with public comment closing on 6 August 2025
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — 'Dredging of the Malamocco-Marghera Canal' (8 July 2025). Confirmation that the EIA for dredging the industrial channel that carries large ships from the Malamocco inlet to Marghera was admitted on 7 July 2025, with comment closing 6 August 2025 — the works file carries no published sediment volumes or costs on this page
- Commissario Straordinario per le Crociere — press area index. The chronology of the programme from 2022 to 2025: the Lombardy and Liguria tender of February 2023, the Marittima dredging award of February 2024, the preliminary purchase agreement of July 2024 for over ten hectares at Porto Marghera, and the national EIA commission's Venice inspection of 1 July 2025
- AdSP Mare Adriatico Settentrionale — DEASP, energy and environmental planning document (PDF). The port cluster carbon inventory on a 2017 baseline: about 170,482 tCO2 in total, with cruise vessels at 18,147 tonnes at berth and 6,878 manoeuvring, commercial ships at 87,001 and 25,816, internal road transport at 15,182, terminal equipment at 15,834 and rail at 431
- AdSP Mare Adriatico Settentrionale — environmental monitoring. The permanent noise-control network running since May 2021 with four fixed Class I sound level meters at Venice, Marghera, Fusina and Chioggia plus mobile units for mooring and transit measurements, under a framework agreement with the University of Padua signed 9 April 2020; and a long-standing fixed air quality station at Fusina whose data are held by ARPAV
- AdSP Mare Adriatico Settentrionale — energy transition and DEASP. The DEASP described as the carbon-footprint assessment underpinning the port's energy transition, with dock electrification, electric mobility, LNG and the Venice Hydrogen Valley listed as the instruments, partly financed through the national recovery plan
- Port of Venice — 'New industrial plastic recycling investment in Marghera thanks to the Simplified Logistics Zone' (20 April 2026). Eco+Eco s.r.l. of the VERITAS group investing about €34 million — €22 million in plant, €12 million in infrastructure — on more than 41,000 m² of the former Alcoa area on Via della Geologia, creating around a hundred jobs over roughly two years of construction
- UNESCO World Heritage Centre — Venice and its Lagoon (C 394). Inscription in 1987 under all six cultural criteria, a property area of 70,176.4 hectares, and the sequence of state-of-conservation examinations in 1989, 1990, 2014, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025
- UNESCO — Decision 44 COM 7B.50, Venice and its Lagoon (2021). The Committee welcoming the measures banning ships over 25,000 gross tons from 1 August from the San Marco basin and the San Marco and Giudecca channels, and noting approval for a temporary mooring of large ships alongside a long-term solution prioritising the option outside the lagoon altogether
- UNESCO — Decision 45 COM 7B.189, Venice and its Lagoon (2023). The Committee reconfirming the ban, requesting studies of environmental impacts, asking Italy to 'continue to prioritise the option of redirecting large ships to other more suitable ports', welcoming the experimental entry fee and booking system, and setting a reporting deadline of 1 December 2024
- UNESCO — Decision 47 COM 7B.113, Venice and its Lagoon (2025). The Committee welcoming continued enforcement of the ban, requiring environmental assessment before port development, asking Italy to consider prioritising redirection of large ships to other ports, and warning that without urgent coordinated action the property could come to meet the criteria for inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger
- Italy — State of conservation report on Venice and its Lagoon submitted to UNESCO (2024). Italy's own account of decree 103/2021 with all four thresholds; 'construction of no more than 5 temporary moorings in the Marghera area, 2 of which will be available for the 2022 cruise season'; the capacity split of 700,000 at Porto Marghera's North Canal terminal, 250,000 at Venice's cruise terminal and 50,000 at Chioggia against about 2 million before the decree; the €5 access fee from 25 April to 14 July 2024; and the outside-lagoon tender timetable
- Italy — State of conservation report on Venice and its Lagoon submitted to UNESCO (2026). Italy describing a new cruise model that 'excludes large ships from the lagoon, uses widespread docks in Marghera and Chioggia for medium and small ships, halves the number of passengers, and applies cold ironing'; two temporary docks planned in the Marghera industrial area; new docks outside the lagoon only after approval of a new port master plan; and the access fee extended to 54 days in 2025 and 60 days in 2026
- Italy — State of conservation report on Venice and its Lagoon submitted to UNESCO (2022). The two 2021 emergency measures set out together: Law Decree 45/2021 providing for a competition of ideas for docking points outside the lagoon, and Law Decree 103/2021 declaring the waterways a national monument and banning transit; up to five temporary docking points in the Marghera area, three built by summer 2022; and a competition for berths for passenger ships above 40,000 gross tonnage with a procedure deadline of 30 June 2023
- UNESCO World Heritage Committee — WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add, state of conservation working document. The World Heritage Centre's own record of the June 2019 collision between the cruise ship MSC Opera and a river barge in the Giudecca Canal, set alongside the 2012 Costa Concordia grounding as the safety background to the 2021 decree, and the proposal of alternative moorings in the industrial area of Marghera
- UNESCO World Heritage Committee — WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add, state of conservation working document. The 2023 analysis for Venice, recording that the property 'continues to face serious threats from cruise ship traffic and related infrastructure development' and concern over cumulative impacts on the lagoon's integrity and Outstanding Universal Value, ahead of draft decision 45 COM 7B.189
- Comune di Venezia / Venezia Unica — contributo di accesso, frequently asked questions. The fee at €5 if paid by the fourth-last day before access and €10 within three days or at a tobacconist; the 08:30–16:00 window; the 2026 day list running in blocks from early April to 26 July; exemption without voucher for residents of the Comune di Venezia, people born in Venice, residents of the Veneto and under-fourteens; and the enabling provisions in Legislative Decree 23/2011 art. 4(3-bis), Law 145/2018 and Law 122/2010
- Comune di Venezia / Venezia Unica — 'Cos'è il contributo di accesso'. The charge applying to entry to the Città antica rather than to the Comune as a whole, with transit areas such as the Ponte della Libertà, Piazzale Roma and the railway station excluded, and the notice that the 2026 trial ended and no payment or exemption is required thereafter
- Comune di Venezia — contributo di accesso, official service page. The Comune's own statement that the trial period for 2026 ended and that from 27 July the access fee no longer applies, with any future application resting with the city's governing bodies — the primary basis for treating the fee as an experiment rather than a settled instrument
- ARPAV — Siti contaminati (Veneto environmental agency). The definitions of contamination thresholds (CSC) and risk thresholds (CSR); municipalities running ordinary remediation procedures in the Veneto; the Region competent inside the lagoon drainage basin under regional law 19/2013; and the SIN of Venezia–Porto Marghera falling under national ministerial competence
- ISPRA — Siti di interesse nazionale (SIN). 42 national-interest contaminated sites in Italy covering a little over 148,000 hectares of land, 0.49% of the national territory, with roughly 76,000 hectares of sea inside some perimeters and ten sites re-perimetered to exclude areas no longer qualifying
- Comune di Venezia — Servizio Statistica e Ricerca, serie storiche della popolazione. A resident population of 251,294 for the Comune di Venezia at 31 December 2025, and the four published historical series — by zone from 1871, by quartiere from 1997, total and native from 2010, and by locality from 2001 — all released as spreadsheet files rather than as web tables
- Comune di Venezia — le Municipalità. The six Municipalità of the Comune di Venezia — Chirignago Zelarino, Favaro Veneto, Lido Pellestrina, Marghera, Mestre Carpenedo and Venezia Murano Burano — establishing that Marghera is an administrative division of the same municipality as the historic centre, not a separate town
- GeoNames gazetteer — Marghera and Porto Marghera features, Italy. Marghera as a populated place of 28,622 at 45°27'04"N 12°13'26"E; Venezia Porto Marghera railway station at 45°28'20"N 12°15'19"E; Forte Marghera at 45°28'29"N 12°15'45"E; and the Canale Malamocco Marghera and Canale di Porto Marghera as named waterways
- GeoNames gazetteer — Fusina, Veneto, Italy. Fusina as a populated place in the comune of Mira at 45°25'11"N 12°15'25"E, with the Canale di Fusina, Canale Vecchio di Fusina and Canale Nuovo di Fusina as separate gazetteer entries — the verified fix for the second cluster of cruise berths named in the decree's aftermath
- GeoNames gazetteer — Canale della Giudecca and Giudecca, Venice. The Canale della Giudecca as a named canal at 45°25'38"N 12°19'44"E and the Giudecca island at 45°25'30"N 12°19'35"E with a population of 4,792 — one of the three waterways the decree closes, fixed to a coordinate
- GeoNames gazetteer — Bacino di San Marco, Venice. The Bacino di San Marco recorded as an anchorage at 45°25'58"N 12°20'26"E — the second of the three named waterways, and the only one of the three the gazetteer classifies as a place where ships stop rather than pass
- GeoNames gazetteer — Chioggia and Porto di Chioggia, Veneto. Chioggia as the seat of a third-order administrative division with a population of 49,259 at 45°12'28"N 12°17'34"E, and Porto di Chioggia as a port facility at 45°13'23"N 12°16'37"E — the third node of the redistributed cruise model
Official and scientific bodies are the authority for safety, regulatory and scientific claims. Commercial operators are used only for practical detail such as tour length, meeting points and indicative pricing — never for a safety or scientific statement.
How this was made
Desk research. Compiled from official bodies, scientific and conservation sources, established journalism and licensed operators. Not based on a personal visit.
Editor’s method note — what we checked, corrected and could not verify
- Desk research only. Nobody from this publication has been to Porto Marghera, to the Liguria or Lombardia quays, or to Venice, and this dossier makes no claim to have seen any of them.
- Every URL cited was opened and read before citation. Sources that could not be opened are listed below and are cited nowhere in the piece.
- The article is deliberately written from the mainland. Where a fact could be stated either as something Venice gained or as something Marghera received, we state it as something Marghera received, because the received version of this story is already written the other way round.
- We do not paraphrase the decree from secondary coverage. The four thresholds, the three named waterways, the 1 August 2021 start and the Marghera commissioner clause are taken from the Ministero della Cultura's own release, which quotes the operative wording in Italian. We could not open the consolidated text on Gazzetta Ufficiale or Normattiva and say so below.
- On the number of temporary moorings the sources disagree and we print all three. The culture ministry says at least four ('almeno quattro'); Italy's 2024 report to UNESCO says no more than five; the commissioner's own site says up to five. We do not reconcile them.
- On cruise passengers there are two live series and we keep them apart. The calendar-year series gives Venice 547,587 in 2024 and 584,284 in 2025; the rolling twelve months to March 2026 gives more than 621,000 across the system with Venice up 8.3%. Both are the port authority's own figures, measured differently, and we name the measure each time.
- The central question we were asked — how many of those passengers came ashore at Marghera — is unanswered because the figure does not appear to be published. We checked the 2024 annual report, the fourth-quarter 2025 statistical bulletin and the season note; all three report cruise passengers for Venezia and Chioggia and stop there. We refuse to estimate it.
- The comparison of 584,284 against the roughly two million a year Italy reports for the pre-decree period, and the comparison of 2025 against the 2022 figure of about 240,000, are our own arithmetic across cited sources and are labelled as such in the body.
- Coordinates come from the GeoNames gazetteer. We use only entries we opened: Marghera, Fusina, Chioggia and Porto di Chioggia, the Canale della Giudecca and the Bacino di San Marco, the Venezia Porto Marghera railway station and Forte Marghera. The gazetteer also returns a 'Venice Harbour' entry whose coordinate did not agree with the industrial zone's position, so we have not used it and we do not pin the Liguria or Lombardia quays, for which we found no gazetteer or official fix.
- Sources we could not read, and therefore did not cite: the consolidated text of decreto-legge 103/2021 on gazzettaufficiale.it and on normattiva.it, both of which returned only a loading shell; the Ministero dell'Ambiente's SIN pages and its bonifiche portal, 403 and a robots failure respectively, which is why we give no hectare figure for the Marghera perimeter; the national EIA portal at va.mite.gov.it, 403; ARPAV's live and historical air-quality station data, whose pages either 404 or render the station list only in scripted components we could not read, so we cite no Marghera air-quality measurement anywhere; the Comune di Venezia's population spreadsheets by quartiere and by locality, blocked by robots rules, which is why Marghera's population is given from the gazetteer and not from the city; ISPRA's Seveso establishments inventory, 404; the port authority's 2022 sustainability report, which exceeded the size limit; and Italy's 2020 report to UNESCO, likewise.
- Things we could not verify: how many cruise passengers embarked or landed at Marghera in any year, no terminal-level split being published; the area in hectares of the Venezia–Porto Marghera Site of National Interest and the share of it remediated; any air-quality measurement at a Marghera monitoring station, ARPAV's data not being readable by us; the resident population of the Municipalità di Marghera as recorded by the city rather than by a gazetteer, and how it has moved since 2021; total employment in the Porto Marghera industrial zone, for which we found no primary series; the number of the four-or-five temporary moorings actually in service today, the sources giving three by summer 2022 and two elsewhere; who currently holds the office of Commissario Straordinario, the commissioner's site still naming Fulvio Lino Di Blasio while the port authority issued a presidential statement under the name Matteo Gasparato in May 2026; the outcome of the competition for berths outside the lagoon, whose deadlines have moved twice and whose preliminary design was due in March 2026; the revenue raised by the access fee and the number of people who paid it, held in an annex to Italy's 2026 UNESCO report that we could not obtain; and whether the access fee will return in 2027, which the Comune says rests with its governing bodies.
AI is used to draft this text, and a human checks it. Every figure, date and quotation above was verified by Tony Hall against the source cited for it in the reference list; where sources disagree, the disagreement is shown rather than resolved, and where a claim could not be confirmed it is either marked unverified or left out. The illustrations are AI-created and labelled as such — no photograph on this site is presented as a record of a real place. Full disclosure · Editorial policy.
Access details change — recheck before you travel. Found an error? Tell us — corrections are dated and shown in place.
AI illustration


